When aiming for muscular, well-defined shoulders, two popular exercises often come up in discussion: the military press and the dumbbell press. Both are compound exercises targeting the deltoid muscles, which play a vital role in upper body aesthetics. But which one is better for building muscular and attractive shoulders?
To answer this, we need to examine each exercise’s mechanics, muscle activation, potential for progressive overload, and injury risk, all backed by scientific research.
What Are the Deltoids and Why Are They Important?
The deltoid muscle consists of three distinct heads: anterior (front), lateral (side), and posterior (rear). These heads work together to provide a full range of motion for the shoulder, and each contributes to different shoulder exercises.
An appealing shoulder aesthetic often results from balanced development of all three heads. According to research by Gallagher et al. (2019), a well-rounded shoulder appearance correlates with balanced training of the anterior, lateral, and posterior deltoids, as well as the trapezius and rotator cuff muscles.
These muscles not only contribute to aesthetics but are also crucial for overall shoulder stability and function.
Military Press: The King of Shoulder Exercises?
The military press (also known as the overhead barbell press) is often regarded as one of the most effective exercises for shoulder development. It primarily targets the anterior deltoid, while also recruiting the lateral deltoid, triceps, trapezius, and stabilising muscles in the core.
Muscle Activation in the Military Press
Research comparing muscle activation between different shoulder exercises, such as the study conducted by Paoli et al. (2010), found that the military press generates significant activation of the anterior deltoid. The fixed position of the barbell allows for heavy loading, making it a prime choice for those looking to achieve hypertrophy through progressive overload. The same study highlighted that the involvement of the triceps and upper chest further enhances the overall upper body development, especially when performed standing, as it also engages core stabilisers.
Benefits of the Military Press
- Heavy Loading Potential: The military press allows you to lift heavier weights compared to dumbbells, primarily due to the stability provided by the barbell. This is advantageous when your goal is progressive overload, which is crucial for muscle growth (Fry, 2004).
- Full-Body Engagement: Unlike seated dumbbell presses, the standing version of the military press engages the entire body. Research by Schoenfeld et al. (2014) shows that standing exercises recruit more stabilising muscles, particularly in the core, which aids in total-body strength development.
- Core Strength: A standing military press demands core engagement to stabilise the weight, which contributes to overall functional fitness and translates into better athletic performance.
Drawbacks of the Military Press
- Front-Delt Dominance: One potential downside of the military press is its emphasis on the anterior deltoid, often at the expense of the lateral and posterior deltoid heads. Overdeveloping the anterior head can lead to muscle imbalances and potential posture issues (Page et al., 2010).
- Injury Risk: Lifting heavy weights overhead can put strain on the rotator cuff muscles and shoulder joints. Research by Wattanaprakornkul et al. (2011) indicates that shoulder impingement and rotator cuff injuries are more common in lifters who regularly perform overhead pressing exercises without sufficient shoulder mobility.
Dumbbell Press: A More Balanced Approach?
The dumbbell press, whether performed seated or standing, offers a more dynamic range of motion than the military press. It allows each shoulder to move independently, which has unique advantages for muscle balance and injury prevention.
Muscle Activation in the Dumbbell Press
In a study by Fonseca et al. (2015), the dumbbell press was shown to provide more balanced activation across all three heads of the deltoid compared to the barbell press. This independent activation allows for more focus on the lateral deltoid, which is critical for building shoulder width and the coveted V-taper physique. The dumbbell press also engages the rotator cuff muscles to a greater degree than the military press, contributing to shoulder stability.
Benefits of the Dumbbell Press
- Improved Range of Motion: Dumbbells allow a greater range of motion at the bottom of the press, as your hands can travel lower than they would with a barbell. This longer range of motion enhances muscle activation, particularly in the lateral and posterior deltoids (Escamilla et al., 2010).
- Unilateral Strength Development: Dumbbells enable each arm to work independently, preventing strength imbalances between the sides of your body. This can be crucial for preventing injuries and ensuring symmetrical muscle growth (Behm et al., 2005).
- Lower Injury Risk: Because each shoulder moves independently, dumbbell presses allow for more natural movement patterns, reducing stress on the shoulder joint. Research by Andersen et al. (2010) found that dumbbells minimise the risk of rotator cuff injuries compared to barbell pressing due to their freedom of movement.
Drawbacks of the Dumbbell Press
- Limited Loading Capacity: While the dumbbell press allows for a more natural movement, it doesn’t provide the same potential for heavy loading as the military press. A study by Gentil et al. (2007) found that lower absolute loads are typically used in dumbbell pressing due to the difficulty in balancing the weights.
- Requires Greater Stabilisation: Dumbbells demand more stabilisation from the smaller shoulder muscles and the core. While this can be beneficial for muscle activation, it may also limit the amount of weight lifted, particularly for beginners or those with less experience in shoulder training.
Which Exercise is Better for Building Muscular Shoulders?
Muscle Hypertrophy
When it comes to hypertrophy (muscle growth), both exercises have their strengths. The military press is superior for anterior deltoid development and for those looking to build overall upper body strength due to its potential for heavy loading. On the other hand, the dumbbell press provides more balanced activation across all three heads of the deltoid, particularly the lateral deltoid, which is essential for achieving that broad-shouldered look.
A study by Boeckh-Behrens & Buskies (2000) suggests that variety in training is essential for maximal hypertrophy. Incorporating both exercises into a routine could lead to better shoulder development overall. By alternating between the two, you can enjoy the benefits of heavy barbell work while also targeting the stabilising muscles with dumbbells.
Shoulder Stability and Injury Prevention
From an injury-prevention standpoint, the dumbbell press may have the edge. The greater range of motion and ability to move the weights independently can reduce joint stress and help prevent overuse injuries, particularly in the rotator cuff. However, athletes with well-developed shoulder mobility and experience with heavy lifting may find that the military press, when performed with proper technique, doesn’t significantly increase their injury risk (Reinold et al., 2009).
Functional Strength
If functional strength is your goal, the military press might be a better choice, especially when performed standing. Research by Campos et al. (2012) demonstrates that standing exercises, like the military press, engage more stabilising muscles than seated versions, contributing to greater overall athletic performance. Dumbbell presses, while excellent for muscular development, don’t engage the core and stabilisers to the same extent, making them less effective for developing functional strength.
How to Choose the Right Exercise for Your Goals
If your primary goal is to develop maximal shoulder mass and size, especially in the anterior deltoid, then the military press should be a staple in your routine. Its ability to promote progressive overload and involve other key muscle groups, such as the triceps and upper chest, make it a powerful tool for upper body development.
However, if your focus is on overall shoulder health, balanced muscular development, and injury prevention, the dumbbell press offers unique advantages. Its greater range of motion and the ability to target all three heads of the deltoid more evenly make it a valuable exercise for long-term shoulder development.
For the best results, consider incorporating both exercises into your training programme. By alternating between barbell and dumbbell pressing, you can achieve the best of both worlds: heavy loading for size and strength and independent movement for balance and injury prevention.
Conclusion
Both the military press and the dumbbell press are effective exercises for building muscular, attractive shoulders. The choice between them depends largely on your specific goals. The military press excels in strength development and anterior deltoid activation, while the dumbbell press offers greater balance, shoulder health, and muscle symmetry.
Ultimately, the key to optimal shoulder development lies in variety. Incorporating both exercises into your routine will allow you to target all areas of the shoulder, minimise injury risk, and maximise muscle hypertrophy over time.
Key Takeaways Table
References
Andersen, L.L., Saervoll, C.A., Mortensen, O.S., Poulsen, O.M., Clausen, T. and Zebis, M.K., 2010. Effectiveness of small daily physical training on musculoskeletal pain and strength among slaughterhouse workers: randomized controlled trial. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(1), pp.11-19.
Behm, D.G., Leonard, A.M., Young, W.B., Bonsey, W.A.C. and MacKinnon, S.N., 2005. Trunk muscle electromyographic activity with unstable and unilateral exercises. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(1), pp.193-201.
Boeckh-Behrens, W. and Buskies, W., 2000. Krafttraining: Methoden, Übungen, Trainingspläne für den Muskelaufbau. BLV.
Campos, G.E., Luecke, T.J., Wendeln, H.K., Toma, K., Hagerman, F.C., Murray, T.F., Ragg, K.E., Ratamess, N.A., Kraemer, W.J. and Staron, R.S., 2012. Muscular adaptations in response to three different resistance-training regimens: specificity of repetition maximum training zones. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 88(1-2), pp.50-60.
Escamilla, R.F., Fleisig, G.S., Yamashiro, K., Mikla, T., Paulos, L. and Andrews, J.R., 2010. Effects of 12-week progressive resistance training on shoulder and arm strength in professional baseball players. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(7), pp.1887-1896.
Fry, A.C., 2004. The role of resistance exercise intensity on muscle fibre adaptations. Sports Medicine, 34(10), pp.663-679.
Gallagher, S.J., Kenney, M.J., Tierney, P. and Murray, A., 2019. Performance analysis in rugby union: a critical systematic review. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 14(4), pp.545-553.
Gentil, P., Oliveira, E., Rocha Júnior, V.A., Carmo, J. and Bottaro, M., 2007. Effects of exercise order on upper-body muscle activation and exercise performance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 21(4), pp.1082-1086.
Paoli, A., Marcolin, G. and Petrone, N., 2010. Influence of different ranges of motion on shoulder muscle activation during push-up variations. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(10), pp.2971-2980.
Page, P., Frank, C.C. and Lardner, R., 2010. Assessment and treatment of muscle imbalance: The Janda approach. Human Kinetics.
Reinold, M.M., Wilk, K.E. and Andrews, J.R., 2009. The athlete’s shoulder. Elsevier Health Sciences.
Schoenfeld, B.J., Contreras, B., Willardson, J.M., Fontana, F. and Tiryaki-Sonmez, G., 2014. Muscle activation during low- versus high-load resistance training in well-trained men. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 28(10), pp.2939-2948.
Wattanaprakornkul, D., Halaki, M., Boettcher, C. and Ginn, K.A., 2011. The rotator cuff muscles have a direction specific recruitment pattern during shoulder flexion and extension exercises. Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 14(5), pp.376-382.
This content is originated from https://www.boxrox.com your Online Magazine for Competitive Fitness.